Poster
CER

[IPVS 2026] Improving Diagnostic Sensitivity in Cervical Cytology: A Comparative Study of an Automated AI-Integrated Workflow versus Manual Microscopy

miLab™ CER-assisted review raised inter-observer agreement among cytologists to an almost-perfect level (Fleiss’ κ 0.810) compared with conventional microscopy, supporting standardised, reader-independent cervical cytology screening.

IPVS 2026

|

October 22, 2026

|

Mijin Kim, et al.

[IPVS 2026] Improving Diagnostic Sensitivity in Cervical Cytology: A Comparative Study of an Automated AI-Integrated Workflow versus Manual Microscopy

Unauthorized downloading or distribution of this poster is strictly prohibited.

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of miLab™ CER, an all-in-one digital cytology platform integrating automated staining, digital imaging, and on-device AI analysis, on inter-observer agreement in cervical cytology, compared with conventional light microscopy. A total of 150 liquid-based cytology (LBC) slides, balanced across The Bethesda System (TBS) diagnostic categories, were independently reviewed by three cytologists under both conditions with a 2-week washout period. With miLab™ CER, inter-observer agreement improved from moderate to almost perfect (Fleiss’ κ 0.553 → 0.810), and overall reader agreement increased from 47.4% to 60.9%. Agreement on clinically critical HSIL cases rose from 0% to 27.8%. The results show the potential of miLab™ CER to deliver standardised, reproducible, reader-independent cervical cytology screening.

miLab™ CERMicroscopyDifference
Inter-Observer Agreement
Fleiss’ κ (3-category)0.8100.553+0.257
Overall agreement rate60.9%47.4%+13.55 pp
HSIL agreement rate27.8%0.0%+27.8 pp

Table 1: Inter-Observer Agreement: miLab™ CER vs. Microscopy

Keywords

cervical cancer
digital cytology
AI diagnostics
inter-observer agreement
LBC
Bethesda System

Related Publications